Showing posts with label opposition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label opposition. Show all posts

Friday, 15 May 2015

JLP vs PNP- This “little” issue of a referendum

A referendum was held in Jamaica  on 19 September 1961. Voters were asked "Should Jamaica remain in the Federation of the West Indies?" The result was 54.1% voting "no", resulting in the country leaving the federation and its dissolution in 1962. Voter turnout was 61.5%.

Let us place this discussion in context. Back in 1961, Bustamante opposed Federation as it appeared that T&T had too much leverage and Jamaica would be better off becoming Independent. Well we all know the result, that is why we became independent in 1962, even though Jamaica's first elections was held on December 12, 1944.  Federation failed then as the Caribbean nations were not on the same page, however Regional Integration is not to be dismissed because of the state of affairs then, which does not necessarily exist now. Fast-forward 54 years and our Opposition Leader is boasting that he is  “a Nationalist….who does not come from the school of those who chase after a fleeting and elusive dream called Integration.”

How bad really is integration, whether it be purely economic? The European Union, The North American Free Trade Agreement, Association of SouthEast Asian Nations, The North American Free Trade Agreement, Union of South American Nations are some examples currently in place.

We are too small to survive on our own and collaboration with like-minded states in the same geographical vicinity has the potential to strengthen our economic voice and position in the free world. Opportunities exist not only in the English-Speaking Caribbean but in our neighbouring Spanish, French and Dutch counterparts, whose market we are unable to penetrate thus contributing to the limiting of our growth and reach.

But I digress, so focusing  on the bone of contention currently is the Caribbean Court of Justice vs Privy Council as our final Court of Appeal, there is a lot of hulla-balloo whether a Referendum should be put to the pople. Reference is made to a covert agenda, and I am curious to know what then is the opposition’s agenda, as I am of the view that both sides need to come together and not push a partisan agenda just because one’s predeccesors promulgated a particular viewpoint. Times have changed, our ecomonic standing has changed, Jamaica needs a savior. That savior is not IMF, the people who are in positions of power need to think and act rationally and put the people first.

Should a referendum be put to the people? The PNP is not for it, and I wouldn’t expect them to be, in light of the last referendum where our past Premier Norman Manley stepped down after losing the not-so- long-after called elections. I believe they are wary of this precedent especially since we are so far into the election term and everyone on both sides of the fence are on their “P’s and Q’s” trying to solidify party votes.

The JLP on the other hand through a statement of their leader has trivialized the issue and has said that if it is to be considered, it should be put to the people. I wholeheartedly agree with putting it to the people but not the trivialization of the issue. A public-education campaign is not bad , educating the populace on the issues so that they can make an informed decision. But announcing a Grand Referendum is ludicrous if that step is not taken. The voters will simply vote along party lines, and we all know that the voter turnout which will not be representative of the true population, nor will it reflect the true wishes of the people.

To “referend” or not to “referend” is the question

Tuesday, 23 December 2014

LESSONS FROM FIDEL and THE CUBAN REVOLUTION

by: Kymberli Whittaker
Bachelor of Arts, History (Hons)
Bachelor of Laws (Hons)
LEC

“Convict me; It doesn’t matter. History will absolve me.”

A man who dared to oppose the mighty United States of America; A man who had a vision and executed it with an iron hand; A man who put the people first. His name is not synonymous with democracy but his speeches, his participation in wars all across the world helped to preserve so many nations while breaking them out of bondage and mental slavery- thus contributing to their democracy. Fidel Castro is an epic leader of our time. His life which has been marred by propaganda has many lessons. No, he is not perfect or the best leader, this world has ever seen, but there are some salient lessons which his approach to change and maintaining change can teach us:


1) Elevation of the Mind
One can succeed and improve their mental state, only through increasing knowledge sought after daily. Fidel attempted a Coup, and was unsuccessful and he was imprisoned for two years in Cuba. Instead of being discouraged and giving up the fight, he resorted to consuming literature which elevated his mental state. His thirst for knowledge I believe, exposed him to different ideas, thus making him uncomfortable with his present realities. 


Reading 12-16 hours a day, while imprisoned, made him the man we know of today.
An important part of his Revolution was Education, without education, the people could not improve. 1961 was named the year of education. Thousands of young people set out into the isolated parts of the island to teach farmers and uneducated persons how to read and write. A literate nation is a better nation, and a nation that can make informed decisions. Elevation of the mind is key in facilitating change.

2) No man is an island
This may seem contradictory given the stance he took in not bowing to International pressure which opposed Communism and sought to demolish him, leaving Cuba isolated for many years. He knew that support is needed for any cause. Travelling to speak with members of the Diaspora, he formed links and the bonds were cherished as he sought to promote his ideals. He made individuals feel Important and through that approach, many supported him and continue to support him today.


On the way to start the Cuban Revolution in 1959, one of him men fell overboard as they travelled by ship to land. Fidel refused to leave this man, and he and his crew searched the dark murky waters until they found him. This act delayed the synchronized co-ordination of the attack on Batista’s forces, as some of his followers were already waiting on land, and started the revolution without the support from the Sea. The death toll was high, and of the original 82 men who came by ship, only 21 managed to regroup in the Sierra Mountains to recruit farmers and others to assist them in the fight.
Fidel surrounded himself with strong personalities such as Che Guevara, men who got the work done. He did not do everything by himself, nor did he try to.

3) If at first you don’t succeed try and try again
Remember Fidel failed the first time, and please do not think it was easier the second time. The actual war between Fidel’s followers and Batista’s troops lasted two years. Perseverance will yield results, perfect your craft and always know your objective. Do the necessary groundwork to be able to win. Winning is most times hard, but it is always possible.


4) Be strategic in all decisions
During the Batista dictatorship, a reported number of 20,000 Cubans were killed. The people were fed up, tired, and fearful and the words of Fidel who campaigned to them was music to their ears. He made them feel as if they were first class citizens who deserved better and needed to take a stand against the Government who did not have their best interests at heart. The people longed for sovereignty and independence and this was the platform he used to gain mass support


He was aware of the importance of the media, and he made sure he was accessible to the press, even in English. Any person especially in government should know that the press should not be your enemy. Consistently refusing to talk to the press especially on major national issues, will cause mistrust to fester in any country- Including Jamaica. One must be strategic in ALL decisions.

5) No weapon formed against me shall prosper
He did something I am almost sure Jamaica would never do, oppose the United States of America. For years they terrorized and reigned through their ‘Big Stick Policy” popularized by President Theodore Roosevelt, where they sought to control and involve themselves in the running of governments, setting up Presidents and removing them when they no longer served a purpose. Batista’s forces were trained by the US who armed them with artillery and aircraft.  In his words,

“The overt war against the country, became a covert war against the man”

The US opposed Fidel essentially because he we for his own people which naturally conflicted with US interests. The US fueled by capitalist motives had nothing to gain by his reform. Through the “Agrarian Reform Act” property was redistributed as foreigners owned almost 70% of the arable land and most of the sugar industry was in US hands. No money was staying in Cuba, and what remained did not benefit the masses.


Fidel’s family was by no means impoverished and he expropriated land from them as well, leading by example. For years, through an embargo which lasted from 1960-62 until 2014 Cuba was punished severely for not backing down from the US. The Cold War which has often been used as the reason for hostilities does not make sense as the “US-Cuba Cold War” outlasted the "real" Cold War, which ended in 1989. Increasing agitation from the UN and the changing global climate which sees nations such as China rising in superiority has shown that even though one may undergo isolation and hard times, no weapon formed will prosper and hard times will not last forever.

6) No matter how hard times are- Help Others

The Embargo really stifled economic growth and prosperity in that nation, however Cuba is known for helping other nations, whether they are neighbouring Latin American states such as Bolivia or as far away as Vietnam, where Cuba during their war sent rice, sugar and blood donations to them. They  sent trained doctors, engineers and agricultural workers to assist in not only the fight , but the building back.

Fidel’s family was by no means impoverished and he expropriated land from them as well, leading by example. For years, through an embargo which lasted from 1960-62 until 2014 Cuba was punished severely for not backing down from the US. The Cold War which has often been used as the reason for hostilities does not make sense as the “US-Cuba Cold War” outlasted the "real" Cold War, which ended in 1989. Increasing agitation from the UN and the changing global climate which sees nations such as China rising in superiority has shown that even though one may undergo isolation and hard times, no weapon formed will prosper and hard times will not last forever.

In 1975 as Angola moved towards independence from Portugal, the CIA along with the apartheid government of South Africa tried to bring down the new Angolan government. At the request of the Angolan president, Fidel sent 36,000 troops to keep the South African forces from attacking the capital, Rwanda. In 14 years of war over 300,000 Cubans- doctors, engineers, teachers and soldiers played an important role in Angola, over 2000 died.

In 1988 Fidel sent in more Cuban troops and with this increase, a large nail was driven into the coffin of Apartheid, and he helped to shed light on the struggle of the African people. African History has been shaped by Cuban presence and assistance and Nelson Mandela was one of Cuba's greatest friends.- Such was the impact and reach of the Cuban Revolution. Such was the reach of Fidel.


Live and learn, separate the bad aspects from the good, and give praise where praise is due, and in all situations- learn lessons.